Prototype the Argument Instead of Winning It
When a team deadlocks on an interaction model, arguing harder just hardens positions. Build both options and let the evidence end the debate before it becomes a conflict.
Tagged
Posts about design decisions, mental models, and the reasoning behind product choices. Not process documentation, but the harder questions underneath the process.
3 results
When a team deadlocks on an interaction model, arguing harder just hardens positions. Build both options and let the evidence end the debate before it becomes a conflict.
Walking a panel through your process is a list. Framing the same work around a decision is a narrative. The difference is where interviewers look for judgment.
Feature count debates miss the point. When your users are vulnerable, every added setting is a new failure mode, and cutting scope becomes a form of harm reduction.